In the field of physical therapy, understanding imaging interpretations is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This module aims to equip physical therapists with the knowledge and skills necessary to interpret X-ray images effectively, focusing on common themes PTs will encounter in the field, such as juvenile hip conditions, cervical spinal pathology, common anatomic variants as well as discussion topics on atypical foot/ankle presentation(s). Additionally, the module will explore the Pittsburgh and Ottawa rules, providing a comparative analysis to aid in clinical decision-making.
This module has two assignments. One will be a discussion forum where you can make a recommendation based on the radiograph of a patient complaining of foot pain and then collaborate with your classmates. The second will involve assessing and evaluating different radiograph images and delving deeper into the Pittsburgh and Ottawa rules. For each assignment, you will research other resources and support your responses in both the discussion forum and your assignment with at least one additional reference.
By mastering the interpretation of X-ray images, such as identifying juvenile hip conditions and cervical spine abnormalities, and understanding the application of Pittsburgh and Ottawa rules, physical therapists can enhance their clinical skills and contribute to more accurate diagnoses and effective treatment plans. This module provides a comprehensive foundation for integrating imaging interpretation into physical therapy practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes and healthcare delivery.
By the end of this module, students will be able to:
McKinnis, L. N. (2021). Fundamentals of musculoskeletal imaging (5th ed.). F. A. Davis Company.
The textbook is offered as an electronic book through the University's library, free with unlimited access.
Implementation of Ottawa Ankle Rules in University Hospital Emergency Room: Pilot Study. (2023)
This study discusses how implementing a protocol based on Ottawa Ankle Rules reduced X-rays, costs, radiation exposure, and improved efficiency in treating ankle sprains.
Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules: Strategies for increasing specificity. (2021).
This study discusses using Ottawa Ankle Rules to reduce unnecessary X-rays for ankle injuries.
Can the Ottawa and Pittsburgh rules reduce requests for radiography in patients referred to acute knee clinics? (2012).
This study investigates whether Ottawa and Pittsburgh rules can be used to avoid unnecessary X-rays for knee injuries.
Introduction to Radiograph Interpretations
This study investigates whether Ottawa and Pittsburgh rules can be used to avoid unnecessary X-rays for knee injuries.
The radiograph above is a lateral view of a 58-year-old female with a history of long-standing diabetes. She has a history of several foot surgeries and is now complaining of general foot pain and difficulty walking. Clinical Decision Rules (CDR) are tools for helping clinicians make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions during initial patient evaluations. They provide a universal language and set of principles to avoid imaging overuse. The Ottawa Ankle Rules are one example of a CDR.
Discuss the following points in your original post. Read your classmate’s viewpoints on the case and share your thoughts about their recommendations. As you work on this assignment, reflect on your experience as a clinician and how your new knowledge can benefit your practice.
Several medical professionals use set criteria when ordering radiographs. Compare and contrast the Pittsburgh and Ottawa rules for ordering radiographs. Which do you think is best? What populations are not covered by these rules? How could the physical therapy profession benefit from a standard set of rules?
Each module will include a knowledge check section. This quiz is to check your knowledge on the topic from this week and it will also give you some idea of the types of questions asked on the graded quizzes. Click below to complete the knowledge check.
Scroll down to respond to the questions using the radiograph image below.
Identify this projection.
An intramedullary rod is present to unite the fracture gap. Does this appear to be the first internal fixation device used in this patient?
Does the hip joint appear normal?